That is correct :) On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 02 May 2009 13:49:13 -0700, Anthony Shanks wrote: > >> It should be working now, try again. > > cite: > /----------------------- > The main feature that distinguishes spNet from gnetlist is the ability to > properly netlist hierarchical schematics using sub-circuits instead of > creating a flat (non-hierarchical) netlist from hierarchical schematics. > \----------------------- > > Does this mean, that back annotation of schematics with hierarchy is > feasible with the netlists produced by spnet? > > ---<(kaimartin)>--- > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user >
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
