> Up to now, I happily choose GPL3 as standard license in my > contributions to gedasymbols.org.
Most of the gedasymbols contributions are GPL for *redistribution* but allow "any use" once they're embedded in a project. Making the user comply with GPL *after* embedding would be problematic, for various reasons. No matter where you pull things from, you really need to understand the licenses involved and how they interact. For example: John's symbols aren't GPL-compatible (because of the "no profiting" clause), so you wouldn't be able to mix them with gedasymbols symbols and redistribute them, but you *would* be able to mix them in a *design*. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
