Any objections to removing the 0,90,180,270 limits to rotated text? http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~pcjc2/geda/screenshots/gschem_rotated_text.png
Need to teach the print output to handle it of course, but that shouldn't be too hard. The only grief comes with the currently magic behaviour at 180 degrees, which basically resets to 0 degrees rotation, and flips the anchor point to the opposite corner of the text box. I'm thinking that it should be possible to seamlessly transform any old schematic which used a 180 degree rotation on load (based on file-format version number). Font sizes give some grief as well. It would be nice if the on-screen font size matched the print font - which means that I drop the magic constant in o_text.c to "1.0" - matching the font's size in points to the requested font size in the file-format. (The old gEDA font is about 1.3x taller than it claims to be). Since auto-magically bumping people's text sizes on load (which will no doubt include some rounding), seems like an "evil" thing to do, I'm considering the idea of adding a couple of adjustment processes: 1. Within gschem - possibly via some nasty popup dialog / wizard when you load an old file. 2. Command line based - so old designs can be (if desired) batch updated. Or.. we could just declare that we don't really care about updating users' schematics. In any case, I'm tempted to bump the shipped symbol library font sizes - to give consistent before/after on-screen rendering. Or.. do we accept the on-screen shrinkage, and place greater value on consistency of .ps printed output from existing schematics? Best regards, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
