On Jun 28, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Dave N6NZ wrote: >> >> Agreed. I've felt that way since the beginning -- for the same >> reason >> that you mentioned: changing package. For me, it's pretty >> annoying to >> have to replace the schematic symbol to go from through-hole to >> surface >> mount just because the pin numbers are different. >> >> > > It just occurred to me that the problem is what a > computer-science-type-guy would call one of "namespace". > > Symbol pin numbers and footprint pin numbers come from the same > namespace in gaf's implementation. They shouldn't.
There already is a separate namespace if you wish to use it: pinseq. But I think that is already confusing enough for most users. > > That is all. :) > > > > b.g. > > -- > Bill Gatliff > [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
