> TI's sn74lvc1g240 part uses what appears dimensionally to be an ordinary > SOT25 package, but the pin numbering is different. Am I better off to > just construct my own footprint, or is there a way to deal with this at > the symbol level and still show the right pin numbers in the schematic?
I'm pretty sure everyone will have a different way to deal with this. My personal preference is to keep the footprint consistent and have different symbols for variances in pin numbering. My reasoning: the footprint is a physical description of a component and can represent multiple components. The schematic is the logical description and the logic (pin numbering in this case) varies for different components. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
