On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:57:37 -0600, John Doty wrote: >> This is not conversion, but a work flow partially in geda, partially in >> some other suite. As nice as it is, > > Name another tool that can do this as easily and flexibly as gEDA.
emacs > > If we take gEDA's strengths for granted, we will lose them. Its hard to stay on topic, is it? >> it does not make the switch to and >> from geda any easier. The missing feature is the ability to import and >> export symbols, schematics, footprints and layouts to and from other >> suites. > > So we need even greater flexibility. Less hard-wired, fewer barriers to > arbitrary transformations. No, we need import and export mechanisms that work. Right now, there is none. Lack of features is the opposite of flexibility. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
