On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 11:41 -0700, Jared Casper wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Peter Clifton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unless there is anyone available to work on implementing it, the point > > is moot anyway! > > While that is true, if those with enough experience and clout in the > project were to spend the time to agree on a plan, or a direction at > least, then people like me could possibly put in the legwork to start > making it happen. I'm not saying I'd have the time, but it's possible > I will early next year, but I think a lot of us agree that this one of > the bigger things that if fixed could really enhance the tool (along > with things like the "universal translator" I've seen talked about a > lot). As it is looking through the history, there's a lot of chatter > about this, but no real agreement on what should be done, so if I were > to have the time to do it, I'd have no idea where to go with it. :) > > Although I guess I may be underestimating what you mean by > "implementing" it. With this kind of thing, the design will probably > (at least should) take as much or more time than the actual coding, > which means there probably needs to be a "higher-up" available to put > in the time to design, or help design, it (which may be what you > meant).
I just meant that there is no point Peter Brett and I debating (dragging up the topic again) it unless we are going to put some effort into the design / implementation. Best wishes, _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
