> This is true, the proper way was to fix the leaks in one patch and > introduce layer attributes in a subsequent one; however, DJ asked > about single patch, and I didn't want to add _buggy_ support for > layer attributes; nonetheless, I explained how to get even that > buggy support.
I'm not going to be anal-retentive about splitting patches into the smallest possible quantum of change, either. The patch had two changes - add attributes to layers and make sure they get cleaned up. They're very related and both somewhat trivial. I don't think anyone would have a problem figuring out what happened if an automated regression tester identified it as a source of problems. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
