Henry Von Bank wrote: > What I would propose would be to leave the slotting behavior alone for > the time being (option a), but hopefully mark it for deprecation in > some future version, as it can be confusing and is not well defined. >
We could actually leave it alone almost indefinitely, because if the symbol doesn't do anything with slotting then the gaf tools don't care. And the symbols I envision wouldn't do anything with slotting. In fact, most of what I've been brainstorming on could be achieved with the existing tools as-is, plus some plugins and scripts. The future work would be to take the concept and make it less user-input-intensive, like have gschem show pin numbers and reference designators on some versions of the schematic, even though that information is not really part of a schematic as I define them. b.g. -- Bill Gatliff [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
