On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:19:41 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote: > The attributes may be names like > > footprint-option=0603 > footprint-option=0805 > > or > > footprint-options=0603;0805
Welcome to the club! ;^) That makes (at least) three of us users who propose to add lists of default choices for attributes. Maybe we should join forces and hack up a patch. However, after my coding debacle last summer I am extremely hesitant to engage in anything the core developers don't explicitly approve in advance. > or both. The gattrib and gschem GUIs can provide support by looking for > these attributes and offer menus to select from the list of choices when > modifying attributes. This is the real benefit. > No new policy imposed, no file-format changes, no gnetlist changes, And above all: No interference with any workflow that may or may not exist with the current state of gschem-gnetlist-pcb-whatever. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
