On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:03:31 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: >> Why not change the workflow so that during schematic capture, there are >> no pin numbers anywhere? "Pins" on symbols get assigned a physical pin >> number during some some later step, at the same time that footprints >> are selected. And then a backwards data flow brings the pin >> assignments back to gschem for display? Of course, I really have >> little idea of the implications of what I'm saying... > > I agree whole-heartedly, to the extent - that pinnumber information > should not be present until you've selected a part to use. (or slot of a > part).
I assume, your rewrite will still allow to print pinnumbers in the finished schematic. This is really useful when debugging circuits with slotted. ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
