> Maybe i missed it, but I haven't seen a reference to something I'd > call global gate swapping.
Assigning gates to packages is one of the things left up to the netlister (choosing) and pcb (swapping) now. > So, is there a sensible way to leave decision actual packages and > relations between symbols and packages open until some later time? Yes, that's the general idea. > As i see it, such a way would be somewhat conflicting with the > current way of slotting symbols and providing refdeses based on > order of entry Yes, the old slotting mechanism would have to be changed or removed to work with this blue-sky idea. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
