I seem to have hit a regression in the quality of output from the autorouter and/or trace optimiser in moving from pcb20081128 to pcb20091103. With 20091103 I end up with many Manhattan traces that the trace optimiser refuses to miter, see the attached images. If you wish to reproduce this, the steps are:
1. Load example pcb "LED2" that ships with pcb 20091103 2. Delete everything except the components 3. Optimise rats nest 4. Select all 5. Autotoute 6. Optimize routed tracks -> auto optimize 7. Optimize routed tracks -> miter 8. Repeat step 7 a few times, just in case it helps. I'm running both versions compiled from source with GCC 4.3.2 on MEPIS 8 Linux. Are these results normal, or is there really a regression ? Thanks in advance, Steve Ecob
<<attachment: pcb20081128.png>>
<<attachment: pcb20091103.png>>
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
