On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 09:39 -0500, Chris Cole wrote: > Just curious, why not include xgsch2pcb functionality inside of gschem?
xgsch2pcb was implemented as a proof of concept project manager, and doesn't really "belong" inside gschem. gschem supports a great diversity of work-flows, only one of which involves producing PCBs with the "PCB" package. This means it would be in-appropriate the make assumptions along these lines in the gschem UI. There might be future scope for making gschem (and other applications) "project aware", but that would likely be much less explicit than xgsch2pcb, as it would need to cater for (or keep out of the way of) all other work-flows. Better integration is a personal goal of mine though. Best wishes, Peter C _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
