-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 28.03.2010 13:17, schrieb timecop: [snip] if you're at the point where you need to rely on web-based DRC > for gerbers (thus you don't trust the tools you use) its time to move > on
It's not the tools I do not trust, but the current process is that the manufacturer publishes the basic design rules on his webpage, I have to translate it to DRC rules for pcb (that's the error-prone part :-) ) and run DRC. Ideally there is an open source tool that checks gerber files (the file format I'm communicating with the manufacturer) and the manufacturer publishes a set of parametere that this tool can read. So I can improve the DRC rules for pcb without having the manufacturer in the loop. Btw, in my day job, I'm doing chip designs, and when we release chips to manufacturing (within the same company), manufacturing checks every mask again, though the release process does this on an input file to mask build. To make my point clear: I'm very happy with the geda tools-suite (compared to some crippled (extremely stripped down) versions of $$$ programs doing the same job). I continue using the geda suite and hope I can do my share to improve it. - -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen Dietmar Schmunkamp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuvu8IACgkQn22l+QvEah34XgCggQVc9U5GZGPAJcKQPgYIajDS lMUAn1fjmLsuAovLA+tcn4rBxehzuytu =lpfl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
