On 07/04/2010, Dave McGuire <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 7, 2010, at 3:14 PM, al davis wrote: >>> Ok, that's fine by me, as it's your list. But could you >>> explain how it could be dangerous? That suggestion sounds >>> quite ludicrous to me. >> >> In general, it really does present a huge legal risk, so I agree >> with the policy. > > I will respect the policy and I apologize for my comment to Bert. > I'm still having a really hard time with the notion of mentioning the > existence of a patent constituting a legal risk. > > -Dave
Many of us still try to wrap our heads around things like that. This article may be of help http://news.swpat.org/2010/03/transcript-tridgell-patents/ cheers. -- Adrian. http://elesquinazotango.com.ar http://www.noalcodigodescioli.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
