On Saturday 24 April 2010, kai-martin knaak wrote: > There should not be a need to search for specific models for > getting started with basic circuits in the first place. The > models don't have to be exact. But they need to be available > right away. >
Ah .. there's a good idea .. "don't have to be exact" .. they never are .... Not detailed, but just good enough for a beginner. ...... Now we need a volunteer to do it. Have things like a generic parameterizable op-amp. .. with parameters like gain, gbp, and so on. Can you make a list of the ones that should be included? On Saturday 24 April 2010, kai-martin knaak wrote: > As for the site: IMHO, the gedasymbols concept is a success > -- It is a central site. Yet, every contributor is > exclusively responsible for his or her own slice. I see no > compelling reason to not use gedasymbols.org for simulation > models, too. If you are annoyed by the name, an alias > "gedafiles.org" may be a solution. No .. the name is not a problem. The vast majority of gnucap users are not geda users. I think that is true of ngspice too. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
