On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 13:52 -0700, Jared Casper wrote: > > However, I think a majority of contributions wouldn't or shouldn't > cause enough controversy or disagreement that the person willing to do > the work of verifying the patch can't just make the decisions. You > just need someone familiar enough the code to know without too much > digging that a particular patch isn't going to affect/break something > the contributor wasn't aware of.
I don't mind reviewing (simple) patches and committing them. I did that recently with the L18N changes and Russian translation. If there is something _in particular_ you want me to take a look at, and you're willing to work with me as necessary (answering any questions I might have) - then get in touch privately. This is always going to be on an ad-hock basis though.. I'm very busy with other things at the moment, and can't devote a lot of time to the job. (I've barely had enough time to keep my own code changes creeping onwards). Probably the best approach is to develop a relationship with a developer and ask them to look at things privately (as well as posting changes publicly). The people to contact would be: Dan McMahill (PCB maintainer) DJ Delorie Ben Jackson Harry Eaton (not particularly active at the moment?) Myself (There are of course other developers, but perhaps not so active recently). Best regards, -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
