Stefan Salewski wrote: >> You just hit a major weakness of the geda-pcb work-flow. There is not >> much in the tools to aid the selection. > > This is true, but we should say that this is in first order a problem > for beginners.
I disagree with this statement. The lack of footprint choosing aids is annoying, even with a fair amount of projects under the belt. I work with geda almost every day and made all the symbols and footprints I use. Still, I find myself scratching my head when it comes to choosing the footprint of some not so common component. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
