On Aug 8, 2010, at 4:51 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote: > No it is not. Even simple things like footprint names have a pretty rigid > syntax to adhere to. The workflow breaks in cryptic ways if they are not > obeyed.
This is a pure "pcb" limitation, not a gEDA limitation in general. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
