David Griffith wrote: > I think I got it right, but would someone please double-check this > footprint for a Bourns 3386P trimpot for me? See > http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/david_griffith/footprints/POT_BOURNS_3386P.fp >
* The position of pins looks ok. Their numbers differ from the numbers in the data sheet. Is this deliberate? * I'd make the annular ring larger to facilitate manual soldering. 80 mils seems like a decent size to me. If the annular ring is a handicap for the layout, they con be shrunken as needed. * The outline of your footprint is a bit larger than the real component. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
