Stefan Salewski <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 09:30 -0600, John Doty wrote: >> All of this discussion of formats misses the shining example that's >> already in gEDA: the schematic format. > > Yes. Recently I begun studying that format and started writing a parser > in Ruby -- really easy. > > One disadvantage of that format may be: > We have lines starting with a letter followed by up to 16 decimal > numbers -- hand editing such lines may be difficult. Not a problem for > me, I do not intend hand editing.
Yes, the gschem file format is much less accessible for hand/awk/sed-editing than the pcb file format. I would not like that to change - on the pcb side. -- Stephan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
