On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 10:41 -0600, John Doty wrote: > > For the same reason that you wouldn't want to use pliers as a hammer. > gschem has very little knowledge of what the graphics *mean*. This is > a very good thing, a key feature of gEDA's design, one that > distinguishes it from all the fritterware out there. >
There are some physicists with very less knowledge of electronics, and there are electronics engineers with very less knowledge of physics. That may be OK, but may be a problem in a team doing astronomic space observation. For gEDA, a gschem variant with some more knowledge about electronics may be not too bad, e.g. for detecting wrong wirings during schematic entry. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
