Peter Clifton wrote: > If VBO rendering slows you down,
Ehm, how would I know, that this is the the actual bottle neck? (What is VBO, anyway?) > Throw your "usual" complexity of board at it. Tried it at work. This is a 3.5 years old, moderate hardware. AMD single processor, 4400 BogoMIPS. Graphics card is nvidia NV37GL Quadro PCI-E Series. Graphics driver is the closed source "nvidia, 173xx legacy version". Pcb was run in a maximized window on my left 1280x1024 monitor. pd-ac: (a small board) http://bibo.iqo.uni-hannover.de/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=eigenbau:photodiodenverstaerker_20_mhz pcb-head (compiled in August 2010: 35 FPS (thin_draw_poly:44 FPS) pcb-GL_before_pours: 20 FPS pcb_local_customisation_no_pours: 20 FPS pidpeltier: (a more koomplex board) http://bibo.iqo.uni-hannover.de/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=eigenbau:temperaturregler_diodenlaser current debian/squeeze pcb-gtk, version 20091103: 25 FPS pcb-head: 12.5 FPS pcb-GL_before_pours: 16.5 FPS pcb_local_customisation_no_pours: 12 FPS lasertreiber: (My most complex real world board. I usually switch off polygon planes) http://bibo.iqo.uni-hannover.de/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=eigenbau:lasertreiber current debian/squeeze, version 20091103: 17 FPS (thin draw poly 25: FPS) pcb-head: 11 FPS (thin_draw_poly:18 FPS) pcb-GL_before_pours: 9 FPS pcb_local_customisation_no_pours: 10 FPS Looks like v20091103 is consistently the fastest binary on this particular set-up. Any idea, why this is so? ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
