Anthony Blake wrote: > We already have a decent footprint/symbol library..
Ermm, no. We don't have decent libraries. What we have, is two sets of inconsistent, incomplete libraries plus an orderless bunch of user contributions in gedasymbols.org. The default symbols refuse to give a clue what footprint to use. No hints for simulation models, either. IMHO, the current state of the libraries is a major weak spot of the gschem-pcb work-flow. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
