John Doty wrote: > Repeat after me: "the library symbols are only starting points".
Which is a pity and a major weakness of geda/pcb. > Everybody has their own working style: the library cannot > possibly cover everybody's. True. However it does not preclude the existence of a library that reasonably matches the needs of a large group of users. The other EDA packages I had the chance to work with, did a much better job at the library front. You could get quite far with their default library. My eagle oriented colleagues hardly dive into the symbol and/or footprint creation business. > Hierarchy->Down Symbol > Delete the offending attribute. > File->Save As > Hierarchy->Up > Delete old symbol, add new in its place. > > Is that really so hard? A GUI oriented work-flow recommended by John D. (!) ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
