Eduardo Costa <[email protected]> writes: > In my opinion, while the idea of the wikibook is fine, it's gonna need > of constant surveillance which in turn, means a pain in the ass for > whoever is at charge.
I think this is FUD > Ideally, all the needed documentation should come together with the > software, and ideally, every developer commiting relevant changes, > should also pay he's phrase or paragraph to the relevant part of the > documentation sources. > > That way it's always in sync and doesn't become a major problem. This did not work that well in the past. -- Stephan _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
