On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:59 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 22:15 +0000, Peter Clifton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Kai-Martin has rightly pointed out that by default, users don't have > > access to set certain flags on bugs - such as priority. This comes in > > handy if you know you're submitting a feature-request (which by default, > > should be the status "Wishlist"). > > It has just been pointed out to me that I should _remind_ people, that > setting the priority status on their own bugs is BAD FORM.
Further suggestions.. as I've altered two of these already. Just a style nit, but I don't think we should close any bugs with "sf-patches" as "Invalid". This rather suggests that the problem the user is trying to patch is somehow non-existent. If we decide we can't / won't accept a patch, please close it with "WontFix" "Invalid" should only be used for submitted patches if the issue is filed against the wrong project, or works around a problem in the wrong place - e.g. fixing a GTK theme bug by patching some horrific kludge into PCB (NB: - that was a made-up example, not from an actual patch). -- Peter Clifton Electrical Engineering Division, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 9, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!) Tel: +44 (0)1223 748328 - (Shared lab phone, ask for me) _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
