Stefan Salewski wrote: > For footprint shape that is correct -- for slots and pin numbers not.
Slot numbers and their influence on pin numbers can safely be ignored in the first stages of schematic capture. With single/dual/quad packages it is not that simple. No algorithm could reliably guess what the designer wants -- which symbols to merge, which pair to choose from a quad. The best gschem might do, is to offer a way to achieve these goals with a minimum hassle. Maybe some kind of multiple symbol mode. (I smell the scent of a feature request ;-) > If I currently place an OpAmp symbol, its inverting, non-inverting > and output pin have already pinnumbers, pinseq, and slotdef > attribute. An enable or offset correction pin may exist or may not > exist. So it is better to know ahead what you want. Regarding offset correction, you better do. If used, the offset needs extra components and nets. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: [email protected] Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
