Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Sure, the attribute has been around for quite some time. That's why I > put in such an attribute in one of my symbols in the first place. But > I don't recall any consequences since recently.
This may be just due to me not using the symversion attribute in most of my symbols. Actually, the master attribute list discourages the symversion attribute in local symbols. Cite master attribute list: /------------------- The symversion= attribute is used to version the contents of symbols. Normally this attribute is not present, but once a symbol has been accepted into the main gEDA symbol library and there are changes to it, this attribute must be placed into the symbol file and properly incremented. \------------------- Why is this so? Is there any potential problem with symversion in symbols not from the default library? ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: [email protected] Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
