It is definitely happening when I try to use a newlib footprint. I solved my 603 problem, but I now have EIA3528 cap with the same issue. The syntax being generated by gsch2pcb is very different. I can't see any documentation in the PCB manual that shows Element( ... ).fp(...) type construction. Oliver __________________________________________________________________
From: Oliver King-Smith <oliver...@yahoo.com> To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@moria.seul.org> Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 7:29:41 AM Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Strange resistor footprints It might help if I post more of the file # element_flags, description, pcb-name, value, mark_x, mark_y, # text_x, text_y, text_direction, text_scale, text_flags Element[0x00000000 "" "" "" 0 0 -3150 -3150 0 100 ""] ( # # Pad[x1, y1, x2, y2, thickness, clearance, mask, name , pad number, flags] Pad[-2559 -492 -2559 492 2952 2000 3552 "1" "1" "square"] Pad[2559 -492 2559 492 2952 2000 3552 "2" "2" "square"] # # This draws a 1 mil placement courtyard outline in silk. It should probably # not be included since you wont want to try and fab a 1 mil silk line. Then # again, it is most useful during parts placement. It really is time for some # additional non-fab layers... # ElementLine[eval(-1*V1/2) eval(-1*V2/2) eval(-1*V1/2) eval( V2/2) CYW] # ElementLine[eval(-1*V1/2) eval(-1*V2/2) eval( V1/2) eval(-1*V2/2) CYW] # ElementLine[eval( V1/2) eval( V2/2) eval( V1/2) eval(-1*V2/2) CYW] # ElementLine[eval( V1/2) eval( V2/2) eval(-1*V1/2) eval( V2/2) CYW] ).fp(0603.fp,R229,87K) So for generating resistors, the gsch2pcb uses a different format than an IC with a footprint I have defined. __________________________________________________________________ From: John Doty <[1]j...@noqsi.com> To: [2]k...@lilalaser.de; gEDA user mailing list <[3]geda-user@moria.seul.org> Sent: Wed, February 16, 2011 7:10:26 AM Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Strange resistor footprints On Feb 16, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: >> T 50700 46500 5 10 1 1 90 0 1 >> precision=1% >> } >> >> in the schematic. What am I doing wrong here? >> > > A stab in the dark: Maybe, gnetlist is unhappy with the "%" character. I don't think so. Gnetlist doesn't care about "%": my schems are full of attributes like "spec=1% 1/10W". John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. [1][4]http://www.noqsi.com/ [2][5]j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [3][6]geda-user@moria.seul.org [4][7]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user References 1. [8]http://www.noqsi.com/ 2. mailto:[9]j...@noqsi.com 3. mailto:[10]geda-user@moria.seul.org 4. [11]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user References 1. mailto:j...@noqsi.com 2. mailto:k...@lilalaser.de 3. mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org 4. http://www.noqsi.com/ 5. mailto:j...@noqsi.com 6. mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org 7. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user 8. http://www.noqsi.com/ 9. mailto:j...@noqsi.com 10. mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org 11. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user