On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:57:44 +0200 Kai-Martin Knaak <[email protected]> wrote:
> But in my humble opinion the project could > benefit orders of magnitude better if the amount of developers time > needed to get such a web based approach going, would be spent at > other areas. From the top of my hat: > > * a unser friendly UI to simulation (plus a good stock of models) > > * back annotation from pcb to gschem > > * full scripting, both within gschem and within pcb > > * a way to represent complex relations between symbols and footprints > > * better support to deal with meta data (order numbers, pricing, etc) > > * push already layed ot tracks durcing manual routing > > * an autoroute with a unser interface that can guide the router > to produce results comparable to manual routing. > > * layout DRC that depends on the net > > * export of 3D models of the layout plus placed components > > * import of 2D CAD data Oh, man! You made me drool all over my keyboard! :-) While I'm sure most of those goals are still quite distant, it would be fantastic to have any of them. Regards, Colin _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
