Stephen Williams wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > It is a quite large executeable (96..2 meg) could that have anything > > to do with it?? > > The 0.6 release had a bug under Windows that the 0.6.1 release fixed. > If you are using a Windows binary, make sure you have the 0.6.1 release, > and not the 0.6 release. (I've removed the 0.6 release binary for > Windows.) > > Otherwise, I'm at a loss, given the information I have. The assertion > is saying that the B-Tree that the vvp symbol table uses was messed > up. Perhaps tripping over a resource limit could cause that, I don't > know. > -- > Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. > steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, > steve at picturel.com and lines to code before I sleep, > http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just wondered because I have a 43.5 meg and a 45.7 meg with the same plidrv.c and they both work. The only difference in this one is more verilog. I am running on a linux box with version $Name: s20020616 $. Lonnie
