From the Archives:
>I did rename them
>so that they follow the -# convention (the -# suffix allows for multiple
>symbols for the same device) and I made all the names lowercase (with
>the exception of letters which are part of the part name).
I'm creating symbols for the Zilog Z8+ family
Parts come in multiple packages. For example the Z8F1602 could be
in in a 64 or 68 pin package.
I'd like to name them Z8F1602-64 and -68. Is that a bad idea?
Convention seem to be -1 and -2 etc. but that doesn't really tell
which one is which by looking at the file name.
Which conflicts with this advice from the web site:
>If you want to make sure your designs to not break once your contributed symbol is
>put into CVS and released,
> do not add the -1 .. -N (where N is an integer) suffix in the filename. I will add
> that when I add it to CVS.
--
http://www.softwaresafety.net/
http://www.unusualresearch.com/ http://www.bpaddock.com/
