As I said, select "QFP menu, generic" from the ~generic library. That will give you a QFP builder. I agree that expanding the geda library is a very good thing though. Just a question of time to add to it with very careful checking.
-Dan On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 16:30:29 +0200 Olof Tångrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there. > Dan, I cannot find a QFP64 pattern in the library you indicate, nor > does the library source of ~generic currently in the SourceForge > CVS-repository contain such a pattern. > > Everyone: > Even if I have found the pattern I still would be missing it form the > gEDA library. I belive patten quality and coverage of the generic > library support would improve if the number of different libraries > claiming to implementing the same pattern or classes of patterns where > minimised. That would also make the program much easier to work with. > I might be wrong about the gEDA library being that unified library but > than tell me which library to use and whom to notify change requests > to. > > Olof > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan McMahill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 11:40 AM > Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Missing generic QFP64 form gEDA PCB library > > > > try library ~generic, and select "QFP menu, generic". If I were you > I'd do some sanity checks on the result (I have no reason to think its > wrong, but you should anyway) > > -Dan > > On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 11:27:30 +0200 > Olof Tångrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I miss a generic QFP64 pattern from the gEDA-library that is shipped > > with the current PCB snapshot. The source file says that it is > > autogenerated but from where is it generated and who is responsible > > for fixing updating the real source? > > > > (FYI, I have tried to make a bug report at the PCB SourceForge > > repository but have not been given any feedback to that.) > > > > Thanks > > > > Olof > > > -- > --