On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Steve Meier wrote: > As a rule I leave snap on. Its only if I am edditting a symbol where I > want some non-pin object in a preceise location that I turn snap off... > And then I am ever very carefull.
Is it possible to add somehow efficiently a feature like in PCB? "Crosshair snaps to pins and pads"? Hope this is not too much creeping featurism ;-) Cl< > > Steve M. > > > Chad Robinson wrote: > > > Bill Wilson wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 21 May 2004 13:04:23 -0500 > >> Bill Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Of that I'm not sure... the last thing I can think of is maybe you > >>> have the snap to grid off. Look for "Snap Off" in the lower right > >> > >> > >> > >> Oh, and if snap was off, the symbols themselves might now not be > >> on grid and you might have to start over placing them because once > >> they are off grid they may not just move back on grid when you move them > >> after turning snap on (not sure about that). > > > > > > This was the ticket. The symbols LOOKED like they were on the grid but > > must have been just slightly off. Even with snap off (to connect > > off-snap-grid) or back on (always off by a pixel or two) I wasn't > > able to establish connections. > > > > Is there any plan to change this sensitivity? It might be nice to have > > a snap-to-connection-endpoint function. That way it would matter where > > on the grid objects were, as long as you were within a few > > pixels-percent-of-zoom to the pin it would do the job. It ought not to > > be that hard to add, is this just a lack of interest thing? This is my > > hobby, not my day job, so I don't know how relevant it is to the pros > > out there. > > > > Regards, > > Chad > > > > > >
