On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:08:34 -0500, Charles Lepple <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:04:45 -0500, Ales Hvezda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I haven't seen any of these bugs. I didn't change any redraw > > code from 20040111 to 20041228. > > > > Mike, I'm curious what version of gtk+ did you use for 20040111? Did it > > change when you built 20041228? There might be some sort of subtle bug > > in gschem which has been masked all these years. > > I'm not sure which version Mikey used, but the version I built used > 1.2.x (where x>10, but I don't recall exactly). I think we both > started from very similar .info files. > > I can try rebuilding 20040111 with exactly the same version of gtk+ as > was used for 20041228, though.
So much for the simple solutions. I rebuilt 20040111 using gtk+1.2.10, and it worked fine. So it does not appear that a gtk+ upgrade broke the new release. I'll try building 20041228 with gtk+2 and see if that works any better. -- - Charles Lepple
