-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Marvin Dickens wrote: | On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 23:09 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote: | | |>I'm not a QT fan. Despite the claims I've heard to its cross-platform |>nature, I've had fairly bad luck with having it run correctly on |>non-intel-architecture systems. FWIW, | | | I've had good luck with QT on Intel and PCC (IBM variety) although, I | had to massage QT to get it to behave on the PPC. I've never worked with | Alpha's. With that said, problems with some architectures will always | exist regardless of the library (GTK+, QT and etc...) :( | | In your opinion, what library do you think plays well with the most | architetures/OS's? It seems to me that the library that plays well | among the different architetures/OS's is what any new gui should be | written in.
For my part, I've had good luck w/ GTK+ on Linux/i386, Linux/AMD64, Linux/alpha, Windows (there are precompiled MinGW libraries for Windows) and MacOSX (Fink). If you avoid GNOME additions, then GTK+ is not bad, probably no worse then Xt. (Heck, it doesn't even require X Windows:-) It's when the GNOME nonsense kicks in that all heck breaks loose.
- -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB4/7TrPt1Sc2b3ikRAkelAKDGkwtdvanNMXQB7gzOPkA6tPKzUQCgrpVW p6ee5bLucDKXbs7OdfEMCK0= =9Gwd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
