why not rename the entire g_key_XXXX to something else (g_keys_XXX ???) seems more appropriate than just g_key_file_new. if you let me know which approach and what actual name you would prefer i'll submit a (unified?) patch tonight.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:28:38 -0500, Ales Hvezda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >it took a while, but about a million sed scripts later i've > >successfully compiled gEDA 20041228 against gtk/glib 2.6.0. isnt > >someone supposed to fix this in cvs? i tried it too, but it appears > >to still be affected. > > > > Yeah, contrary to what the release notes said, I haven't had > an opportunity to fix this yet, mainly because I don't have a gtk+ > 2.6.x installed yet. If somebody does, and wants to submit a patch for > this to me, that'll be great. This fix is just renaming g_key_file_new > to something else in the noweb sources and of course testing it. Thanks. > > -Ales > > PS. gtk+ 2.6.x is not officially supported by gEDA/gaf 20041228. > >
