I have been naming my directories in the form --- <component group>-<component subgroup>
A few examples --- connector-header/ connector-power/ connector-misc/ ic-Linear-Technology/ ic-Maxim/ ic-misc/ passive-resistor/ passive-capacitor/ passive-inductor/ semi-BJT/ semi-FET/ semi-diode/ symbol-power/ (* jcl *) On 9/11/05, Ales Hvezda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > >* Note that I have *not* attempted to clean up the symbol directories, > >nor have I created a new spice-device directory. I figure we should > >have a larger discussion with Ales and everybody else if we decide to > >do this. In any event, we can limp along with what we have right now > >quite well. > > I have been neglecting the symbol library, so the next major > version of gEDA/gaf will be a symbol cleanup/reorg release. I'm all ears > to what issues people have with the existing symbol organization/layout. > > Few things that have come up recently: > > 1) The analog/ directory should probably be split or renamed up into > something more reasonable. I'm open for suggestions. The name > "passives" was suggested a while ago. > > 2) Yes, I'm all for creating a new spice directory, or making sure that > all the symbols in the spice directory work. > > 3) I want to go through and make sure that all vendor specific symbols are > in vendor specific directories. I remember a few complaints about this. > > Others? > > -Ales > >
