> Now back to the original problem: two symbols identically > named symbols will most likely not have identical signatures/hashes > and it would be impossible for the wrong symbol to be silently > netlisted. > > Comments on this idea?
I think it's a good idea. Could we somehow set up a directory priority so far? That would help too. Levente -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: ha5ogl ICQ: 48710903 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: kieg_tk16 Home Page: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs Public key: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs/cuccok/public_key ________________________________________ /"\ \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign X against HTML email & vCards / \ http://arc.pasp.de/ Have Fun, & Linux! 73 for all by HA5OGL. This message was generated by Sylpheed.
