It seems that !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sci-electronics/tclspice-0.2.15" have been masked.
tclspice is broken and that is why Geda is masked under amd64 on gentoo Marc :) On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 01:31 -0400, Dan McMahill wrote: > I'm not sure what the whole 'masked' thing means (I'm not a linux user), > but I've used gEDA for years on a 64-bit system (alpha) with no problems > so I'd be suprised if it didn't work correctly on AMD64. I know for a > fact it at least builds on AMD64 running NetBSD, but I don't have one to > try running it on. > > You may have issues with some of the dependencies. I know that us alpha > users have had to fix countless bugs in 3rd party software. gEDA should > be fairly 64-bit clean though. > > -Dan > > > Marc wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I was wondering if the Geda suit is gonna be ported for AMD64, I know > > its in the Gentoo portage but its masked off as unstable buggy or > > something. > > > > this is what i get > > > > BusyBox64 ~ # emerge geda > > Calculating dependencies > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "geda" have been masked. > > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > > request: > > - sci-electronics/geda-20041228 (masked by: missing keyword) > > - sci-electronics/geda-20040111-r1 (masked by: missing keyword) > > - sci-electronics/geda-20050313 (masked by: missing keyword) > > > > For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page > > or > > refer to the Gentoo Handbook. > > > > BusyBox64 ~ # > > > > > > its been like this for months > > > > Marc :( > > > > > -- Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
