Steve, I am interested in helping, I have started digging through how gschem is put together and started experimenting with scheme. I'm not comfortable yet but I'm getting there.
In addition to hierachial busses, I am interested in bussed pins. I am in the habit of putting address and data busses on one pin. In viewdraw I label the pin D[0:31] and put pin numbers #=1,2,3,...32. This saves a lot of drawing space. When I troubleshoot I use a manufact. package pictorial of bus pin placement anyway (for these busses). Bussed pins I see as a little different, hierarchal symbols don't need the pin numbers. I would like to see what you have implemented... David. >Steve Meier > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>What is the status of busses in gschem? >> >>I looks to me like gschem lets you draw them >>but expects any processing to be done elsewhere. >> >>Has there been any discussion about aliasing net >>names to bus related names by rippers? >> >>I like the feel of gschem, At my paying job I >>am a Viewdraw user, I like the similarities >>although I have not crashed gschem yet, enough said! >> >>Good job guys with the gEDA project, I hope >>to be able to contribute, I am experimenting with >>modifying the PADS backend to increase the >>attributes passed to PADS. PCB looks good too >>but just doesn't have quite the capabily, yet... >> >>David. >> >> >
