> > Hi Stuart, > > El jue, 09-02-2006 a las 21:34 -0500, Stuart Brorson escribi=C3=B3: > [snip] > > > Also, I'm interested in knowing more about gschem source code. Where > > > can I get the commented version of the source code? Do I have to use > > > noweb tools in order to get the commented version of the source code? > >=20 > > The source is indeed the noweb code. I can't say that there are a lot > > of comments in there, however. . . . =20 > >=20 > > What are you looking to do with the source? If you are going to hack > > libgeda, I have the beginnings (only the beginnings ...) of a document > > capturing the libgeda API on my website (back up again, BTW) at: > >=20 > > http://www.brorson.com/gEDA/ > >=20 > > The doc is called libgeda_functions.sxw. Please feel free to use it > > and add to it if you wish. > > Shouldn't noweb handle the documentation as well? > If we are using noweb as the documentation system, maybe it would be > more helpful a tip about how to get the noweb documentation (in ps or > pdf) from the source. I know there is a lot of undocumented functions in > the code, so the next thing would be to add more noweb documentation as > we dig in the code. Thus a little howto about how to add and what style > use with noweb documentation would be worth... > > Am I missing something?
Hi Carlos -- As far as I know, you are missing nothing. Two points: 1. I don't know how to use noweb to get the documentation out. 2. I don't know how much textual documentation is in the noweb code anyway. Perhaps a noweb guru could run noweb on the code to get the documentation out? I'd be happy to take the output and stick it in my doc. Stuart
