bifferos wrote: > But not of a proprietry layout.
Ok, I missed the point about the mandatory GPL license of derived work. > You'd need the equivalent of a > 'runtime exception': > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html Sets of footprints and symbols are a lot like fonts so the font exception may be similar to what the geda lib needs: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException To me it looks a lot like the runtime exception anyway... > ...although I've no idea what you'd call it here. What about "footprint exception" or "symbol exception"? ---<(kaimartin)>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://lilalaser.dyndns.org/blog
