On Thursday 02 March 2006 17:22, Dan McMahill wrote: > Oh, the other question I have for you is can you elaborate on the bugs > in gschem? I've used it for a few years now and have found it to be > quite stable.
Check in your regular inbox (outside this list) :-) I figured I would send that direct to you first, and then maybe you could forward it here with any changed you felt were necessary :-) -- "Sometimes paranoia can be helpful. Usually it isn't, and when you learn that, life improves." Vanessa Dannenberg
