Em Sáb 04 Mar 2006 22:03, kmk escreveu: > Stuart Brorson wrote: > > FWIW, I wrote a blurb about this question for the wiki a couple of > > weeks ago. Here it is: > > > > http://geda.seul.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=geda:faq-gschem#what_should_i_d > >o_about_power_pins_on_my_symbolsmake_them_visible_explicit_or_invisible_im > >plicit
> Nevertheless, I don't see how I could implement this technique with > gschem. There seems to be no way to let a gschem symbol contain slots > with different pinout. The same problem arises if a component has slots > that perform different functions. This is the case for some analog > multipliers that contain an additional opamp with no internal connection > to the multiplier. Did I miss something obvious? > > ---<(kaimartin)>--- Right and wrong. You are right when say that you cant made a slot to put only the power pins. And that makes sense because, like your example, a triangular opamp dont use a triangular box with power pins. I never used something like that, I allways use rectangular boxes for power pins. What I do its just to draw another symbol, with just the power pins and give him the same refdes of the IC.
