I'll put in my 2 cents. I am only a short-term geeklog user (last month or two). I chose Geeklog because of its security model. The article has some good points. . .but I really don't think the user has tried to use access levels much. I will have to agree that Postnuke has many more modules (the LDAP module and shopping cart module are two that I would like to be able to have), but when it comes to configuring security/access levels, there is no comparison. Postnuke needs a lot of work on the security side to even compare with Geeklog (especially with easy of setting security levels). It does have a more polished look and many more out-of-the-box features. . .but unless you are running a site in which all info is publically accessible, have fun.
Anyway, my 1.5 cents, TechFan ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] including javascript in blocks > Dear Geeklog-ers, > > Yesterday someone posted this article on http://news.schoolforge.net (aka > opensourceschools.org) claiming, without substantiation, that post nuke was > superior. If you have a moment to lend a critical eye to the exact claims and > respond, I'd be grateful: > http://opensourceschools.org/article.php?story=20030614125833623 > > Sincerely, > > David > Long-time satified Geeklog customer > > -- > http://www.iteachnet.org > http://members.iteachnet.org/webzine * > http://opensourceschools.org * > http://www.rose-marie.ac.th * > > > ------------------------------------------------ > http://members.iteachnet.org/ > http://www.opensourceschools.org/ > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > >