>This page is not Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional! >http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.geeklog.net > >isn't this bad?
It's not exactly bad, but certainly could be better. It's not too hard to create a valid Geeklog site[1], but it does require some discipline when posting and you can't assume that all of your users will produce valid HTML in their stories / comments. Also, some of the plugins don't exactly produce valid HTML either (for example, many of the errors on geeklog.net seem to be caused by the forum block). bye, Dirk [1] try <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.macosx-faq.de> -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/
