On 17/03/01, John Stoffel wrote: > >>>>> "Klaus" == Klaus Ethgen <klaus+gee...@ethgen.de> writes: > > Klaus> Today I found that github changed their term of service effectively for > Klaus> today.[0] > > Klaus> The new term of service seems to be a bit problematic and disallows to > Klaus> have geeqie on github. Or better said, geeqies license (GPL) is > Klaus> incompatible to github term of service. > > Klaus> I am no native English speaker and also no lawyer, but there is > Klaus> a good analysis[1] describing the problems. > > No, there is one person's analysis of the problem, and who doesn't > talk about the issue in a legal manner. When someone throws around > phrases like "it's now illegal" when a site changes it's terms of > service, then the stupdity is flowing. > > Klaus> Please have a look and comment. I think, the only way is to > Klaus> remove geeqie completely from github. And please don't push any > Klaus> content to github (the original geeqie repository is ok) unless > Klaus> the issue is cleared. It seems that until we continue _using_ > Klaus> github, we agree with the new term of service, what we might > Klaus> not be able to do. > > I don't know why you think these terms change anything? It's just a > way for github to cover themselves from lawsuits if someone takes and > posts on github stuff they don't own. > > It's not suddenly making GPL software illegal on there at all. Its > like the terms and service agreements that lots and lots of other > sites have in place as well. > > Please do not freak out over this, do not stop people from pushing > stuff to github, and certainly do not apply the flaky reasoning of > just one non-lawyer's opinion to this project. > > If they don't like the terms of service, then fine, they can move > their project(s) elsewhere. Big deal. > > Basically, all github is saying that when you push stuff up there, > it's publiclly available and that you give them the right to make it > visible to others. It's *your* job to make sure you have the right to > do so, not theirs.
I just asked Red Hat Legal (some of our projects are hosted on github) to have a quick look at this and they don't perceive a conflict between the github ToU and the GPL. > John slainte mhath, RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs -- ~\ -- ~\ <hpv.tricolour.ca> <www.TriColour.ca> -- \___ o \@ @ Ride yer bike! Ottawa, ON, CANADA -- Lo_>__M__\\/\%__\\/\% Vote! -- <greenparty.ca>_____GTVS6#790__(*)__(*)________(*)(*)_________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Geeqie-devel mailing list Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel